Showing posts with label pro choice. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pro choice. Show all posts

Sunday, June 26, 2022

22 Women

As the anniversary of the overturning of Roe v Wade approaches, I thought I'd update an article I wrote a couple of years ago.

I can think of 22 women off of the top of my head who have had abortions. Many of them would be unable to today if they lived in the same states in which they received their original medical care. 

Nine of the women aborted due to fetal anomalies. Of the twenty-two, I know at least three who had to do so during the second trimester because the anomaly developed or was only able to be seen during the second trimester. In one case, the person initially was told, after learning her fetus would not survive (incompatible with life), that she would have to have the abortion out of state. But they found out that they could do an induction early and remain at their home hospital.

Five were teenagers or not in stable relationships and didn't feel ready or interested in having a child.

Three were married but couldn't handle more children.

Three were in bad marriages and couldn't cope with more children and being in a bad marriages.

One was married with two children but was destitute and couldn't afford a third child or the medical expenses involved in prenatal care and recovery from what would be a third c-section.

One was raped. 

For these twenty-two women, abortion was part of their healthcare, both physiological and psychological. It still makes no sense to me why the government is involved in these decisions.

"That woman, that family, might seek spiritual guidance, they may seek medical guidance, but that decision is not going to be made any better medically or morally, because the government is dictating how that decision should be made," answered Pete Buttigieg when he was pressed on Fox News about third trimester abortions, which are extremely rare, when he was running for President.

I understand and respect that for men and women who oppose abortion that this is a deeply religious issue. They really feel that they are doing God's work by banning abortion. A woman's right to healthcare does not supersede that for them. However, they shouldn't be deciding the law of our land.


For five of the six Supreme Court Justices who overturned Roe v. Wade, they weaponized the law to serve their religious dogma. Catastrophically, they created a health care situation that puts the United States way outside the human rights bounds for women living in like-countries (ones in the EU, Israel, Australia, UK, New Zealand, and Canada,).

Women in states with restrictive abortion laws are dealing with cases where doctors are refusing to treat women in distress because they fear that they will be jailed. Idaho's biggest hospital has to fly patients out of state to avoid risking their doctors being prosecuted. 
At 20 weeks, Samantha Casiano found out her fetus would not be compatible with life. Under Texas law, she had to carry the fetus to term, deliver her, and plan her funeral four hours later. 

It's too bad we can't turn back time and laws couldn't be written by OBGYNs. Perhaps there was room for compromise. Now the laws are based on obtuse jargon that has no place governing a woman's body. 













Wednesday, March 11, 2009

Let her be...

Give Bristol Palin a break.

As a teenager, she fell for a guy, had unprotected sex which resulted in a pregnancy, decided to keep the baby and try for marriage with said guy.

I’ve seen more understanding in the media for murderers and girlfriend beaters.

Here are some of the headlines I've seen about the break up:
Bristol Palin splits with ‘white trash’ Levi Johnston (Boston Herald)
OMG! Bristol and Levi are dunzo! (Christian Science Monitor - yeah I know)
Bristol Palin, fiance Levi Johnston split. Surprised? (LA Times)
Bristol Palin and Her Baby Daddy Break Up (E Online)
Bristol Palin Dumps Sex on Skates! (New York Magazine)

Put yourself in her shoes. Her mom, out of left field, ran for vice president while she, a pregnant teen, was shoved into the international spotlight wearing maternity clothes and then shoved back to the family compound to avoid embarrassing the campaign.

Governor Sarah Palin, sadly, used her own daughter to promote her flawed so called family values agenda. The abstinence only education that Governor Palin touts is totally ridiculous, but it’s unfair that Bristol Palin will be lampooned for the governor’s inadequacies both as a reasonable thinker and as a mother.

You can choose your Vice President, but you can’t choose your mother.

And hopefully Bristol will be a better mother to her son and empower him with sex education so that he will have his first child when he is ready.

Monday, October 27, 2008

Help the women of ...

South Dakota. I know. I don't personally know anyone in South Dakota. Neither do you probably. But we need to help protect reproductive rights in South Dakota because if a proposition passes there that severely restricts and criminalizes abortion rights, the same laws could be coming to a state near you.

Donate NOW to http://www.sdhealthyfamilies.org/ to help fight the proposition banning safe abortions for women in South Dakota. I am personally going to donate one hour of my salary from teaching Adult ESL to fight the proposition.

This law just makes me angry. If you disagree with abortion, then don't have one. You can even choose not to go to a doctor who agrees to peform one. But don't tell other women what to do with their bodies or their lives.

If all of the pro life money went to something productive, like protecting children who are already born, then perhaps the world would be a better place.

If you donate, let Scarpeta readers know!

Also, this is what I listened to this morning (they also have an article if you are not interested in the audio) that inspired this blog:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=95942981